
If you've read The blogosphere's take on the 2007 NAR convention (Updated) -John Novak - posted on 11-17-07, you've already got the overall information on the event.
I like to highlite the issue that dominated the event about the "negative media reports" regarding the real estate market and the ripple effect thereafter on the general economy.
From the NAR's chief economist to panel moderators and member participants, the subject came up over and over -- it's all to blame on these negative news stories that are scaring buyers away from the housing market.
Blame for real estate's current depression was also directed to the regulators for not acting on interest rates fast enough and to the lenders for making too many subprime loans.
The subject was up and out for debate... and debates were getting hot. So much so that became eminent to ignite an open exchange of ideas at Inman News. We learned that today dozens of letters were received responding to a column by Bernice Ross, a real estate coach and author who writes a weekly article. In her column, "Real estate hurt by media spin," she gives a different perspective on what she understands to be negative spin on real estate housing media news.
I recommend you to spend few minutes and read the article. Her suggestion is to spin it the other way by revealing the positive facts. Many readers wrote in to say they agreed with Ross' that somehow the media is at fault for focusing to much on the bad news. But not everyone agreed...
Still remains a controversial issue, opinions are divided but the bottom line is that no matter how we perceve that it is about time to look for solutions. The actual crises of housing industry changed the face of real estate forever.
Glenn Dorfman, chief operating officer of the Minnesota Association of Realtors, says: " that the industry should be cautious not to fall into the "blame someone else American ethic." Real estate has been hurt by spin, but irrational exuberance has been much more damaging than negativity could ever be. I for one am tired of the attacks by those who don't know the difference between ignorance and optimism. Too many 'optimists' view 'realistic' projections as negativity and try to discredit those with opposing views," he wrote.